The colour purple is a particular favourite of Somlat's.

You can use a combination of income and savings in a Thai bank for the retirement extension.Super Joe wrote:He should see a good divorce lawyer Sarge!!
Seriously though its a sh!tty deal if you got refused by 50k Baht because of a serious currency fluctuation the week before.
Would they show some leniency and be decent enough (Buksi no need to reply) to allow you a bank top-up of said amount even if not in your book for the 3 months ?
The obvious thing to do is to have some bunce in your bank but how far do you go, exchange rates can go mad.
They don't seem to increase the 800k in line with inflation every year either, which is a bit of help.
SJ
I'd agree with that, HH seem to take pleasure in searching for ways to prevent an extension rather than helping to get one.niggle wrote:I have no doubt that HH would refuse - not their problem if exchange rates go down the pan.
There is a difference between getting physically kicked out and no longer qualifying for a visa you've had for 5 years because the goal posts have moved.sargeant wrote: as guess says I have never heard of anyone being thrown out of Thailand other than for Criminal activity
If it the same person we are referring to it was a set up by another criminal who paid when this one didn't.buksida wrote: I only know one person that has been deported, and yes that was for criminal activity. But I do know many that have moved on because they can no longer get a visa to stay, granted its their own choice but they have been forced to make it.
I responded to this yesterday but it's gone. The questions I have are:lomuamart wrote: You can use a combination of income and savings in a Thai bank for the retirement extension.Strictly speaking, if you go this route, the savings do not need to be in the bank for 3 months before application. That only applies if you're using the whole 800K.
Unlikely it was about ten years ago.Guess wrote:
If it the same person we are referring to it was a set up by another criminal who paid when this one didn't.
In the second instance, what choice did the people have if refused a visa. Does this mean they can revert to the Ranong, Ranong, Ranong, Penang, Soi102, Ranong formula for ever.
As far as i know, immigration want to see evidence that the lump sum has been used throughout the year and then topped up to the required level, otherwise there will be a suspicion that you have been working illegally in Thailand; however with new extensions since the rules changed a few years ago, lump sums in a bank are not applicable to those based on marriage, you have to show the monthly income of 40,000 baht or more, and only 'grandfathered' cases can still use the lump sum route, and I still think my first point applies to those.Guess wrote: I responded to this yesterday but it's gone. The questions I have are:
Can the same lump sum be used every year or must it move out and back in again to be accepted?
Secondly, with regards to a visa based on marriage, can this amount remain in the bank or does it only have to be shown for the first application as I have been told (but doubt)?