poosmate wrote:I think if we as foreigners had the same immigration status in the UK or any other country we would be looked upon unfavourably when it came to credit. I could not see a "alien" getting a good credit score.A bank or finance company needs to ensure it is repaid or has security. Someone on a temporary visa without anything secure except maybe cash is not a good risk.
The difference being that after 5, 8, 10, however many years on a work permit you would qualify for permanent residence in most countries. Not here.
You want to buy an asset. You apply for a loan. The bank says no, you have no assets as security. Bit of a dilemma. But surely the asset you're buying is its own security?
prcscct wrote:.....and, if you want to call it racist, I wouldn't disagree. It's not racist in terms of color IMO but in terms of paranoia. I think Thais lack self confidence and are scared to death that they can't really compete on the world stage, and the country could be swallowed up if they loosen up. Rather than seeing it as an opportunity, they see it as a threat.
I'd go along with that in general terms, though unsure about the reasons.
prcscct wrote:I think the root of it concerning financing still lies in Thailand's age old distrust of anyone not Thai. That history and mindset has seeped into everything here. You have to remember that less than 100 years ago the average Thai didn't even know a world existed outside of Thailand. I'm sure there are still a few million today who know that something exists on the other side of Thai borders, but they're not really sure what. Why that thinking and lack of education was nurtured can only be attributed to control.
margaretcarnes wrote: ... I don't think the average Thai is paranoid about foreigners. Quite the opposite IMO they have an arrogance, or at least a confidence, in Thailands ability to get by without outside interference.
It's one of the few countries never to have been colonised. They simply don't seem to see any need to drag themselves into the 21st century and to be honest they get by in their own sweet way.
Pete was talking about Thailand rather than the average Thai, so I think you're both talking on similar lines, and I agree.
As for Thailand never being colonised; the nation may well believe this to be significant (leaving aside the obvious and total humiliation by the Japanese 70 years ago that few Thais know anything about), but it seems to me that this is mainly because 150-200 years ago they ceded huge amounts of their territory and persuaded the European powers and the USA that they were more use as an independent state than as another colony. Militarily, its greatest weapons at that time were its lack of open-ocean borders, malaria and the mountains this side of Burma.
I suppose we inevitably look at things from our own point of view, but that seems to me unlikely to produce any results. We're simply not important enough to matter. The whole question of Thailand and its attitude is fascinating, and we'll be talking about it forever. There'll never be a Eureka

moment when someone suddenly sees the answer. I've tried to say this before and usually wound up offending someone, but I don't care how long you've lived here, how many Thai wives or boyfriends you've had or how much Thai you speak, you'll never really know what's going on. It's great fun trying though, and I intend to spend the rest of my life working on the problem!

As for the question... I'm sure
Spitfire knows that it's way too broad, but it has certainly led to some very interesting discussion. I'll give it a 'no' vote.