
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14029995
That would certainly make sense as long as the particles from coal burning are getting high enough up above the majority of the atmosphere.prcscct wrote:Another article that puts a whole new twist on cause and effect thinking. Pete![]()
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14002264
Are you suggesting that when Svante Arrhenius wrote in 1908, "If the quantity of carbonic acid in the air should sink to one-half its present percentage, the temperature would fall by about 4°; a diminution to one-quarter would reduce the temperature by 8°. On the other hand, any doubling of the percentage of carbon dioxide in the air would raise the temperature of the earth's surface by 4°; and if the carbon dioxide were increased fourfold, the temperature would rise by 8°." he just had an eye on taxation?perhaps governments are creating a climate of change (pun) as a means to increase taxation
So which bit of greenhouse gas theory is in error?Even the great Arrhenius would admit to the possibility of error!
That's the problem.... it's impossible to differentiate between the credible and "incredible" scientists!all credible science.
I don't find it a such a big problem to believe that mankind has cocked-up the environment and to be honest, I would be extremely dubious of the motives of anyone who tried to make me believe otherwise.hhfarang wrote:That's the problem.... it's impossible to differentiate between the credible and "incredible" scientists!all credible science.
hhfarang wrote:
That's the problem.... it's impossible to differentiate between the credible and "incredible" scientists!
I have no doubt that man has cocked up the environment in many ways. That's not really my argument. I'm dubious of those who have solutions to the problems that will make millions for them or their cronies and possibly do worse damage in the long run because they twist their argument and the facts for political or financial reasons... very few of those touting imminent disaster from global warming are like you Steve (I believe you really care about the environment with no hidden motive or agenda).I don't find it a such a big problem to believe that mankind has cocked-up the environment and to be honest, I would be extremely dubious of the motives of anyone who tried to make me believe otherwise.
Again Steve, I agree with you, but how, how, how, can we do that. We are addicted to petroleum, not just for fuel, but nearly everything, and most of the products made from it are not good for the environment either because they are difficult to get rid of.To be honest, in my opinion if we're not sure if fossil fuels are destroying the environment, the logical thing to do would be to stop using them until we are sure instead of playing Russian roulette with the world.
You try to go without anything made from petroleum for one day. That means you have to walk everywhere, and be careful that none of your clothing is made of plastic such as buttons or zippers or shoe soles. You can't eat or drink from plastic or use any appliance which all have plastic parts nowadays.They are after all a finite source and what we have might be of more use for essential services for future generations.