No, I am not an “expert” in anything. I did serve a 5 year apprenticeship in the electrical industry, followed by several years of post trade night school studies in marine engineering. I still hold an “A Grade” West Australian electrical workers licence, but no longer hold a “Contractors” licence. I have worked extensively on American systems and equipment, from 12 Volt automotive systems up to 4160 Volt AC systems, generators, distribution and control systems, big industrial variable speed drives with SCR controls, etc., but not house wiring per se.HHF wrote:I know Nereus is an expert in electricity
That’s the sort of statement I would expect from a couple of other egotistical forum members, not from you that always has something sensible to contribute. Where did I say that Australia does not use small breaker panels?HHF wrote:if the Australian standard of building (wiring not in conduits and small breaker panels) is true and similar to Thai typical Thai construction, then as far as I'm concerned the building trade Australia is a second world.
Nereus wrote:All of that is on a single "consumer unit" with maybe 10 breakers, and is single phase, with a 30/100 amp supply. That's how it was built before I bought the house. It should never have been done like that, but is a perfect example of what goes on here. In Australia the supply authority would not connect such an installation.
Please take a look at this link. I am not saying that ALL houses in the US use this method, as I simply don’t know, but according to what I read it is common practice.HHF wrote:In all the U.S. homes I owned (a few) built since 1980, a breaker box similar to the photos I posted was present, and all (modern) homes are required as far as I know to have all wiring (mine all did, even the ones built in the '60s) run inside conduit of some sort.
http://homerenovations.about.com/od/ele ... omexnm.htm
And it goes much further than that. Not only the electrician has to be licensed, a separate licence as a contractor has to be obtained, which also includes provision of $1 Million Dollars of public risk insurance in case you stuff up.chopsticks wrote:The difference is that in Australia electricians (and plumbers ?) have to pass exams and be licenced and registered before they can seek employment. If they don't follow the laid down regulations and cut corners they risk losing their job.
The SAA Wiring rules are extensive and enforced across the entire country to the same standard. NZ also uses the same set of rules. ALL new installations have to be inspected, tested and approved before the supply authority will connect the power. The contractor is required to show calculations to prove that a proper load calculation, amongst other requirements, was carried out.
This is in contrast to the NEC (National Electrical Code) in the US that provides a set of GUIDELINES, not rules, which are open to both abuse and interpretation by local authority jurisdiction. Maybe not completely a bad thing, but there are no uniform regulations, and it therefore follows that there is no uniform standard. (do not confuse the NEC with UL listings, which is an entirely different standard)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Electrical_Code
Without being a smart arse, or putting shite on anyone, consider this: The US has a system where the “active” or ‘live” conductor is referred to as the “HOT” conductor. I was taught that in any electrical system if a conductor is “hot”, then it is probably overloaded or otherwise faulty!

They then go on, in most cases, to designate the colour (color) of this conductor as BLACK, the universal, world wide, colour for DEAD! Makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

I have worked with multi-cored US cables where ALL the conductors were coloured black, with microscopic writing on them claiming, red, white, blue, etc.
In the context of this thread “expectations” have nothing to do with it. The comments being made concern the lack of rules, and basic safety regulations, in connection with electricity in particular. Construction methods is something else entirely.HHF wrote:Like the cost of living thread, it all depends on your expectations, and I gather that people from my country expect a little better quality construction (and life in general) than people from others according to what the experts here have to say.
I am not against the use of conduit for house wiring, but if anyone believes that insisting on its use is going to magically overcome all the other shortcomings encountered in Thai electrical systems, then they are sadly mistaken.
One simple example: please enlighten me how to connect a simple light fixture, such as a “down light” so that ALL the wiring is protected by conduit. If all the wiring is not enclosed, then perhaps you had better put a sign on it (in Thai), asking the rats to refrain from chewing on that exposed section. Ever had a look where there IS conduit and Somchai has not bothered to put the cover on a junction box, or has lost one of the screws and the lid is laying wide open? Makes an ideal place for a nest for some enterprising rat!
In commercial systems, very often overseen by a foreign contractor I might add, metal conduit with the addition of flexible sections run into metal junction boxes that are part of the fixture or appliance, are used. But this requirement has more to do with fire regulations, than keeping the rats out.
Sorry to go on so long, and sorry to Big Boy as your thread seems to have been highjacked.
