Political un-rest and rally

Local Hua Hin and regional Thailand news articles and discussion.
Post Reply
sargeant
Deceased
Deceased
Posts: 4055
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:52 pm
Location: Pranburi CITY

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by sargeant »

cozza Ninjas 10th male burkhas all black face mask
Just to clarify why we wont publish the name

1...we have no desire to meet anyone dressed in the male eqivalent of the Burkha
2...Niether of us speak Cambodian
3...Conversations with kalashnikovs tend to be very short


Mags understood it no problem so does Steve G
A Greatfull Guest of Thailand
User avatar
sandman67
Rock Star
Rock Star
Posts: 4398
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:11 pm
Location: I thought you had the map?

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by sandman67 »

The Down-Trodden Rural Poor of Thailand

It's not quite what you think



Here's what you need to know about the rural have-nots of Thailand. They are the richest poor people in the Third World. And they owe none of their affluence to Thaksin Shinawatra.

Fugitive former Prime Minster Thaksin, a billionaire wanted in connection with corruption and tax-evasion on a staggeringly egregious scale, has done a remarkable job of convincing the world that he is the champion of the rural poor in Thailand, and that such prosperity as the farmer enjoys is in some way due to him. Yet all of "his" programs have been in place for decades. His well-financed public-relations machine merely invented catchy new terms for them.

In Europe and North America, farmers tend to be affluent. A comparison is therefore not at all meaningful. But take a village carpenter in Thailand's northeast and compare him with a wood-worker in a small town in Iowa. To the American, the Thai seems impoverished, his house appalling basic, his expectations in life distressingly limited. But the Thai carpenter probably lives on family land rent-free, pays nothing to moderate the climate, produces his own vegetables, chickens, eggs and pork, and rides his own motor-cycle to his jobs. He's seen the American lifestyle on TV, and it's so far beyond the range of his experience, he doesn't feel deprived or envious.

Every village in Thailand was on the electricity grid long before Thaksin came on the scene, and virtually every village family has a refrigerator, electric rice-cooker, TV, radio and a couple of oscillating fans. Almost all rural households have a motorcycle, though it may be old and battered. In every village several families own pickup trucks. Animals are no longer used for farm work except in extremely remote corners of the kingdom. If farmers don't have a mini-tractor of their own, they rent or borrow one from a neighbor.

The "landless peasant" class exists, but is very small when compared with the Philippines, India and much of South America. The rich absentee farm landlord is almost unknown. Most farming families tend a small plot of land they own outright, mortgage-free (due to unscrupulous practices in the past, an outdated, paternalistic law prevents them putting up land as security with money-lenders, though they may borrow on anticipated harvests.) They sell a small cash crop through a co-operative. Their grown-up or adolescent children supplement the family income from jobs they hold in the cities.

Thailand, like the U.S., has a fallen-through-the-cracks underclass. While statistics*, as everywhere, have to be taken with a large measure of skepticism, officially 10% of the population is below the poverty line (12% in the U.S., 14% in Britain, 36% in Bangladesh). Of course, that means the poverty line for Thailand and no international comparisons are invoked. Poverty doesn't necessarily mean doing without TV or not being able to lean a beat-up old 100 c.c. Honda Dream by the door.

Unemployment in Thailand is 1.4% -- among the lowest in the world. Here it has to be cautioned that employment statistics are notoriously unreliable. Even in advanced countries, economists cannot agree whether to include the under-employed and those not actively seeking work. But unskilled work, if not well-paid, is not hard to find. My Bangkok apartment building has had a "security guard wanted" sign out for weeks.

During the dry season, many farmers supplement their income with construction work in the cities. But some prefer to do without extra luxuries and live the slow-paced, well-fed rural life. Two or three years ago, I found it impossible for several weeks to find a plumber to put in a new bathroom. Many "peasants" have become self-employed entrepreneurs and done well for themselves. Thaksin's policies had no discernible impact on the labor force.

There is no population pressure in Thailand, since each female, on average, gives birth to 1.6 children in her lifetime. That is well below replacement level, so the population will in time shrink unless immigration is vigorously promoted. Reduction in family size was achieved through education and the perceived economic benefits of smaller families, the same way it was reduced in Europe and Japan. This got started in the 1960s.

Wealth distribution in Thailand is no more extreme than in most industrialised countries. The poorest 10% of the people of Thailand own 2.6% of the nation's wealth. The richest 10% own 33.7%. In the U.S., the comparable figures are 2% and 30%, in the U.K. 2.1% and 28.5%. These statistics may not be wholly reliable, but distribution of wealth is unquestionably much more equitable than in China, India, Brazil or South Africa. Even isolated Thai villages, especially in the central plains, would seem very prosperous to rural Pakistanis and positively utopian to most Nigerians. Thaksin's much-vaunted "village revolving development funds" financing local enterprise had their antecedents in the 1970s.

All main roads in Thailand are paved (close to First-World standards), and most secondary roads are surfaced, as are a good many of the tracks that lead into remote villages, even in the poorer north and northeast parts of the country. It was like this when Thaksin was still a bankrupt ex-cop.

There are slums in Bangkok, but you have to go out of your way to find them. Since almost everyone is employed, squatters on state land in the cities often live there by choice because it is rent-free. You certainly do not have to go out of your way to see red-light districts. Incomes from the sex industry (obviously denied to those lacking looks and personally) exceed factory wages fivefold or more. The blind and maimed can apply for state aid, but street begging is often more lucrative. One sets one's own moral priorities.

There was care at government hospitals and health clinics long before Thaksin came along with his fancy $1 scheme. Treatment is not world-class but it is medical care nonetheless. People in need of operations get them for small fees, and if they have no money the charge is written off. No one is turned away from emergency rooms at government hospitals. Doctors who went through medical school on state scholarships owe as many years of modestly paid service in rural hospitals as they had in tuition.

Almost no Thais are unable read & write. Girls on average get 14 years of schooling and boys 13 years (note that girls are ahead). About 1.75 million post-secondary students (over 20% of their age group) are enrolled in universities (ranging from world-class to barely respectable), two-year colleges or vocational schools. Bright kids from poor families get government scholarships, so up-by-the-bootstraps success stories are so common as to be unremarkable. This high rate of upward social mobility goes back at least half a century.

Infant deaths per 1,000 live births in Thailand tallies 17, compared with 180 in Angola, 153 in Afghanistan and 6 in the U.S. Life-expectancy at birth is 73.1 years (78.1 in the U.S., 66.1 in Russia). HIV-positive people make up 1.4% of Thailand's population (0.6% in the U.S.)

With a population of 66 million, Thailand has 62 million registered cellphones and 7 million landlines. Service is as reliable as it is in Europe. One-fourth of the people regularly use the Internet. Thaksin's own company, which prospered prodigiously while he was prime minister, had one-third of the nation's mobile-phone customers. He sold the firm to an investment arm of the Singapore government (and paid no income tax).

Thailand routinely exports more than it imports. It is attractive for foreign direct investment. It therefore has enormous foreign reserves, and even though the country has few natural resources to sell abroad, its reserves, at $138 billion, are the 10th highest in the world. (Britain has $56 billion, Australia $45 billion). This means plenty of capital for employment-creating new manufacturing jobs, which entice rural folk seeking work in cities. The Thai currency is so strong that even recent political troubles have not budged it.

Contrary to a widespread perception, the country's main exports are not agricultural products, but cars & trucks, motorcycles & vehicle parts (made by foreign-owned subsidiary companies). Exported pick-up trucks, the biggest single-selling item, contain negligible imported parts. One Japanese manufacturer sources its world-wide production of one-ton pickups, including those sold in Japan, from its Thai factories. Machinery is another big export, as are components for computers and other electronic goods, textiles, garments & footwear, processed food and animal fodder. Way down the list of foreign-currency earners are rice, sugar and tourism.

Over the years the Thai government has routinely produced a trade surplus, a current-account surplus and (though not this year) a budget surplus.

Since 1960 (when Thaksin was 11) no "developing" country has exceeded Thailand in average annual per-capita GDP growth. The farmers are still poor by western standards, but they've had their share of this rising affluence, and they are better off than rural folk in any other nation on earth for which we reserve the term Third World. ✹

* All statistics quoted in this article were independently cross-referenced from at least three of these sources: UNICEF, UNDP, World Bank, Asian Devt. Bank, IMF, CIA, WHO, Bank of Thailand, Thai National Statistics Office. In no case is a figure quoted from purely Thai sources. In addition, plausibility comparisons were made with the statistics of a number of other countries.
an interesting take on the supposed inequalities..... one I agree with.

:cheers:
"Science flew men to the moon. Religion flew men into buildings."

"To sin by silence makes cowards of men."
User avatar
charlesh
Ace
Ace
Posts: 1512
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:01 am
Location: melbourne/lopburri

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by charlesh »

Strange they don't see themselves as part of the third world except when it comes to handouts.
User avatar
charlesh
Ace
Ace
Posts: 1512
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:01 am
Location: melbourne/lopburri

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by charlesh »

Amnesty could be given to protesters who committed only minor offences and most of them would not serve more than two years in prison. But people facing serious charges such as terrorism and arson would be prosecuted under the law, he said.
"If all sides come to an agreement, a draft law could be proposed to expedite the legal process," Mr Tharit said.

Would this fit as a white wash or cover up I wonder?? What constitutes minor offences - littering, wearing loud shirts and cowboy hats, riding motorcycles without a helmet, child neglect, inciting violence, riotous assembly, going armed in public, discharging missiles etc??
User avatar
STEVE G
Hero
Hero
Posts: 13539
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 3:50 am
Location: HUA HIN/EUROPE

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by STEVE G »

It seems that an amnesty would be aimed at those who were arrested for breaking the emergency decree by being there as opposed to those who were breaking criminal laws:


The Department of Special Investigation (DSI) said it was considering amnesty for rank-and-file protesters who violated the state of emergency imposed during the crisis.

"It would help thousands of people who broke the emergency just by showing up at the protest. Even those who went to take pictures there for fun are in this group," Tharit Pengdit, chief of the DSI, said on Monday.
http://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews ... dChannel=0
User avatar
caller
Hero
Hero
Posts: 11725
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 6:05 pm
Location: Hua Hin

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by caller »

Is that the 2nd, 3rd or 4th time that 'down-trodden poor' thing has been posted here? Its been posted everywhere, but generally a few weeks ago now.

Its actually someones blog, the details of which have been posted elsewhere. I won't put the link here as my security identified 4 threats from the guys website.
Talk is cheap
sargeant
Deceased
Deceased
Posts: 4055
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:52 pm
Location: Pranburi CITY

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by sargeant »

SM your cut and paste imho is bs
Two or three years ago, I found it impossible for several weeks to find a plumber to put in a new bathroom.
i will bet he was really pissed off :shock: :shock: :shock:

when i read crap like that i dont read any more especially when that is obviously the basis of the whole article

oh and agriculturable products are 60% of GDP not the drivel he spouted
A Greatfull Guest of Thailand
cozza
Professional
Professional
Posts: 353
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:16 pm

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by cozza »

* All statistics quoted in this article were independently cross-referenced from at least three of these sources: UNICEF, UNDP, World Bank, Asian Devt. Bank, IMF, CIA, WHO, Bank of Thailand, Thai National Statistics Office. In no case is a figure quoted from purely Thai sources. In addition, plausibility comparisons were made with the statistics of a number of other countries.
Have you got a source for that statistic Sarge?
sargeant
Deceased
Deceased
Posts: 4055
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:52 pm
Location: Pranburi CITY

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by sargeant »

Contrary to a widespread perception, the country's main exports are not agricultural products, but cars & trucks, motorcycles & vehicle parts (made by foreign-owned subsidiary companies). Exported pick-up trucks, the biggest single-selling item, contain negligible imported parts. One Japanese manufacturer sources its world-wide production of one-ton pickups, including those sold in Japan, from its Thai factories. Machinery is another big export, as are components for computers and other electronic goods, textiles, garments & footwear, processed food and animal fodder. Way down the list of foreign-currency earners are rice, sugar and tourism.
my man who does links for me is away as soon as he gets back i will post them but i have seen that figure quoted so many times i couldnt shake a stick at it. But why ask me for a link check his.
he seperates processed food he seperates animal fodder he seperates rice he seperates sugar they are ALL agricultural products.What is their combined %age of GDP
negligible imported parts
i must say maybe you could let me know where they dig the iron alluminium etc in thailand and where all the foundries are i have never seen any
(made by foreign-owned subsidiary companies).
when quoting GDP do they calculate the total profit or do they calculate it after the foreign owned subsidiary companys have deducted their cut ????

that article is written to belittle the rural poor and pretend they are well of
it seems to be based on the view that if he couldnt get a plumber for 3 weeks they must be rolling in it

comparing other countries income and not their costs is stupid its saying i know you are starving but others are starving more than you so shut up

how pathetic
A Greatfull Guest of Thailand
User avatar
STEVE G
Hero
Hero
Posts: 13539
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 3:50 am
Location: HUA HIN/EUROPE

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by STEVE G »

I've seen a study of wealth by area related to the 2007 election and I forget exactly what the measured value was, I think GDP, but the average for constituencies voting in Democrat was 210,000 bt and those returning PPP was 90,000 bt so there is a financial divide.
I'll try and find the website again if I can.
User avatar
PeteC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 32172
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:58 am
Location: All Blacks training camp

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by PeteC »

Here's a place to start to understand the country's economics. You have to register:

http://bangkokpost.newspaperdirect.com/ ... iewer.aspx

Also, if you Google 'Thailand foundries' you'll see many listings and directories. Pete :cheers:
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Source
User avatar
PeteC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 32172
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:58 am
Location: All Blacks training camp

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by PeteC »

Further, if you just want to see raw numbers and percentages of the economy by sector, go to the below. It's the latest I could find where you don't have to register or deal with a "smart" type newspaper format. It's mid-year 2009. At the top, "Thailand Facts and Figures", PDF format. Pete :cheers:

http://bangkokpost.com/epaper/economic2009.html#menu1
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Source
cozza
Professional
Professional
Posts: 353
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:16 pm

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by cozza »

Sarge,

This is the World Bank website.

http://ddp-ext.worldbank.org/ext/ddprep ... EWADVANCED

Agriculture, value added (% of GDP) 2008 - 12%
cozza
Professional
Professional
Posts: 353
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:16 pm

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by cozza »

Pete,

Agriculture is 11.4% according to that chart.

The World Bank link is 2008 & yours is 2009.

Agriculture GDP seems to be on the decline...
User avatar
sandman67
Rock Star
Rock Star
Posts: 4398
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:11 pm
Location: I thought you had the map?

Re: Political un-rest and rally

Post by sandman67 »

ah theres nowt like stats for starting a spat ;-)

look, I keep repeating this point, which applies to both the reds and (to a much lesser degree) the yellows:

A protester in a democracy first attempts to make change through the legitimate parliamentary system. If that fails, or a point needs reinforcing, then you take to the streets in an orderly manner carrying placards. The furthest you push a protest is the peaceful and non violent occupation or blockading of buildings.... you sit your arse down and refuse to move or form up a picket line. When security forces come and pick you up you do not react with any force or resist. You go to court, pay your fine, and go home - point made.

IF you carry any form of weapon, or use or encourage or facilitate ANY form of violence and intimidation then you are NOT a protester. You are a rioter, an insurrectionist, or a terrorist.

The yellows crossed the line when they occupied Govt House rather than just blockading it. The airport occupations were way over the line. Holding the airport and tourists hostage made them insurrectionists.

A point worth making here is we didnt see bamboo petrol soaked barricades and weapons on display at their protests. We didnt have some scumbag tinpot self appointed general swaggering round in a hat sporting grenade pins making thinly veiled threats. They didnt invade a hospital and sexually assault staff and intimidare patients. They didnt burn down any buildings as I recall, nor blow up banks, conduct drive by shootings at security forces, or openly deploy armed paramilitaries.

The reds are a violent unruly mob of armed terrorists. They set off bombs and shoot off grenades. They directly attack infrastructure to sut it down. They burn, loot intimidate and steal. Its what the IRA, UDA, ETA and many other TERRORIST groups did and do. They are TERRORISTS and NO amount of precieved inequality justifies IN ANY WAY their actions.

There is NO comparison between the two groups. The yellows protested in mainly a non violent way, and were mainly the victims of violent attacks. The reds are the instigators and perpetrators of a 12 month and more campaign of violence and intimidation. One side is the equivalent of Greenpeace, the other is the IRA. So, unless you are French, the two are vastly different.

And please, save the poor undertrod references. There are a similar number of poor messed up farmers down south who have to put up with the same so called inequalities AND a pack of fanatic armed terrorists. Why were there none of them marching?

Sarge mate IM a socialist so have sympathy for the poor classes. But the redshirts aint the Tolpuddle Martyrs, and they certainly aint the Jarrow Marchers. The closest any of that scum come to socialism is the Cultural Revoution era Red Guard.... a name I note they ape. Like the Red Guard they simply seek to tear, smash and destroy to facilitate the return of their shabby discredited corrupt Dear Leader. Hardly suprising given Weng and his shabby Maoist cadre chums as leaders eh? The PT and UDD are a pack of hypocritical populist demagogues of the worst stripe.

BOTH groups should face prosecution, but the balance of priorities must be pragmatic, and the violent perpetrators of terrorist attacks against the state and general public must be hammered into the dust first.

Offering any form of anmesty to either side just pisses from a great hieght on the glue that holds society together - the rule of law. Slam the leaders of both sides in jail and leave them there to rot. Impoverish them through siezing all assets, and use these to offset reconstruction and development funds. Extend that from Weng and his chums, and Sondhi and his chums, all the way down to village headmen and footsoldiers. Make justice swift, severe, impartial, consistent and delivered by an iron fist.

Send a message loud and clear from the Tambon offices to the village mom and pop shop.

NO MORE!

Otherwise, you dont have to be one of those Thai Mystic Meg s to work out what happens once the current rice crop is harvested.

Oooooooh the mocha muck at the bottom of my mug is telling me more Songkran mayhem is forecast......

:cheers:
"Science flew men to the moon. Religion flew men into buildings."

"To sin by silence makes cowards of men."
Post Reply