The understudy wrote:Hi there Y'all
Here one example out of Germany of how Mobile networks should work.
In Germany we have four large Mobile Phone Operrators of course they could devide up the Cake in each having 25% but we also have a dozen medium to small size Mobile Phone Ops who in all take about 18 to 20% of the marketshare! By having so many Competitors helps to lower cost to as low as 4.5 Euro\cents per minute or even lower.
It's a concept completely alien to Thais I think.
I think this whole issue is about the concept of alien's doing business in a sector that is prohibited to them
Hi Understudy, you do know that this action is not being instigated by the Thai government or people but as a result of a complaint of a few Thai shareholders of a member of the business community, they have no option but to inestigate it. It's the sort of dirty trick businesses play on rival businesses the world over, in my country some of the bigger companies achieve this by stealing the trash from outside the homes of rival CEO's. It wasn't as bad as that this time as True only seemed to take the legal route in response to the (alleged) illegal foreign company taking... the legal route against them. Has this irony escaped you?
And the reason Dtac took the legal route was they thought the concessions offered were, wait for it.... 'unfair' to them, lofl. They couldn't handle the competition, sound familiar
With regard to 'competition', the foreign majority owned companies who are participating in sectors that are currently prohibited to foreign companies (incl. myself) are the ones who are holding back competition. This is because the firms that the business is open to, Thai companies, are dissuaded from becoming involved because they know that a superior foreign firm can just step in at any moment and put them out of business. You and others on this thread seem to be advocating this 'law of the jungle' type regime be allowed to carry on unchallenged. So do I, but at least I have the honesty to admit I, and the other foreign companies involved, are in the wrong and taking advantage of loopholes in the regulations. True are not in the wrong here just because they can't handle the competition and decided to do a bit of sneaky grassing, it might make them undesirables shall we say, but they're still in the right over this.
And let's not forget Dtac are not being stitched up by some new law that's just been introduced, they're just being asked to demonstrate what they are swearing blind to us is the truth already. No big deal surely... or are they lying and pulling the wool over their adoring fans' eyes

If it's proved they were lying to you will you still support them because they are farangs and not Thais?
Spitfire wrote:Ironically, TrueMove has recently just started a Thai TV/in malls etc advert that is advertising 3G Wifi "finally" to quote the advert correctly. Obviously they are not mentioning that they are one of the parties that have cynically postponed it for so long so that it benefits their greed.
Is this whole issue not the result of Dtac's complaints and threatened legal action as a result of True being awared concessions to go and advance the 3G network/service. Was it not Dtac the 'precious' foreigner who was trying to hold back the Thais from expanding the 3G service? Was Dtac putting themselves before the interests of the customers?... maybe that's what the 'finally' is in reference too
SJ