GLC yes it speaks volumes about Brit duplicity
quote Mr P
Come on then, all-knowing Oracle.
Who fired the first shot. The soldiers? The reds? The 'men in black'?
Who shot 'Seh Daeng' and what was the motive?
Who gave the order to torch the city?
Were the violent mobs paid or were they acting out of ideology?
Was the violence from the reds spontaneous or pre-meditated? If the latter, who should be held to account?
I will take your first line as the smeear crap you always complain about me for, dropped into the gutter i see however even though you are beneath contempt at least i have the decency to answer and debate instead of gossip about innocent people to get my jollies
as for the rest of your post you are asking the wrong man surely your purer than driven snow havashit vegetarian should supply the answers after all he was the UNELECTED PM that should have called for a fully transparent investigation and enquiry after the event seems it slipped their minds
IF HE HAD you would have the answers to your questions now wouldnt you
dont you feel silly right now because you should they were stupid questions wide open for the answer you have just got
I and another member of this forum tried to enlighten people at the time as to who was in charge of the black ninjas we are sure our info is correct and the photos of the dead red shirts nearly all head shot with HOLLOW POINT AMMO speaks a lot feel free anyone to come and have a look bring your own sick bags you will need them
SJ i was not equating drug dealers, others were. my beliefs on that are on a variance to others but never in a million years can that be equated with the shit that went down and the subsequent cover up of the red shirt massacre and no i do NOT blame the military entirely nor havashit but suthep and the dictator get all my wrath