No, but you'd be surprised how many were unapproachable when we took them in. Both of the dogs with the broken legs that I mentioned earlier, are cases in point. The female I managed to get round within a few days & she's now very friendly & seeks attention. The male has been a bit of a problem, snapping at me whenever I go too near. In fact, he wouldn't let me take him from the vets, so they had to forcibly sedate him for me to remove him. Today, though, I'm seeing some progress, he actually took food from my hand and let me touch him. So, I think we'll be OK.Blood wrote:So the dog rescue is full of ferocious dogs which have been tamed?
I would like to clarify one thing, though. Much as I would like to accept praise for the diminished number of dogs on the street, it's not down to HHDRC. Fewer sick dogs on the street, yes. Fewer dogs in general, no. Although if we can manage to raise the money to carry on, and we implement our neuter & release programme, then we hope to contribute towards that problem as well.
To answer some of your suggestions:
I have previously approached international animal groups for funding. We have the problem that we are not a registered charity (it's very difficult to get charity status here, particularly for a farang run non-profit org, although we may be able to apply for foundation status). These groups only give to registered charities - which makes sense.
The Royal Family already have an interest in the tessadban run facility in HH, so I assume, would not be interested in us.
Greater media attention is a good idea. I can try golf clubs again, but they often want quid pro quo (ie we remove all stray dogs for them) Maybe that would work better with the neuter & release programme, as we could certainly neuter "their" dogs for them. Understudy, I'll pm you.
Thanks to everyone (yes, including blood) for their input. I appreciate the interest & the support & also the chance to explain what we have been trying to do & how we'd like to expand on that, if we can keep going.