aim666
-
dtaai-maai
- Hero
- Posts: 14877
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:00 pm
- Location: UK, Robin Hood country
aim666
I'm all for ignoring eejits like this, even multilingual eejits, but I've never seen anyone try so hard to get kicked off a forum. Why hasn't he been obliged yet?
This is the way
Ahhh, now we start a special way to protect the freedom of speech, right?
I really can't believe it, d-m...hope your idea is just a joke, which is born during a couple of too much drinks.
Well, if a person violate the forum rules, it should be the job of the mods and admins to become active, but it's really laughable to start a poll, just because someone feel not able to give contra in a discussion, can't ignore unwise statements, dislike or can’t understand sarcasm, or simply feel pissed, isn't it?
I can't see that aim666 hurt the rules in a way, which make it necessary to kick him off!
Of course, he seems to be provocative, not very constructive and a little bit too proud about his so-called language-skills and school-education.... and may be he hates dogs, too?
But what will be the next, if this is really reason enough to kick a person off? ....
May be everybody should be banned in future, who has not a nice nick, don't like the same music or sort of beer than others with possibly more supporting friends in the background, huh?
Well, than better to close down the whole forum, and make it to a pour platform of advertising for developers, real-estate agents, bar-/pub-guesthouse-owners etc. without any public discussions.
Sorry, d.-m., in the moment my choice would be "no"... but I won't give my voice to this poll, because it's IMO on the same level as some provocative statements from aim666, or others in the past....
I really can't believe it, d-m...hope your idea is just a joke, which is born during a couple of too much drinks.
Well, if a person violate the forum rules, it should be the job of the mods and admins to become active, but it's really laughable to start a poll, just because someone feel not able to give contra in a discussion, can't ignore unwise statements, dislike or can’t understand sarcasm, or simply feel pissed, isn't it?
I can't see that aim666 hurt the rules in a way, which make it necessary to kick him off!
Of course, he seems to be provocative, not very constructive and a little bit too proud about his so-called language-skills and school-education.... and may be he hates dogs, too?
But what will be the next, if this is really reason enough to kick a person off? ....
May be everybody should be banned in future, who has not a nice nick, don't like the same music or sort of beer than others with possibly more supporting friends in the background, huh?
Well, than better to close down the whole forum, and make it to a pour platform of advertising for developers, real-estate agents, bar-/pub-guesthouse-owners etc. without any public discussions.
Sorry, d.-m., in the moment my choice would be "no"... but I won't give my voice to this poll, because it's IMO on the same level as some provocative statements from aim666, or others in the past....
