HHS Said: I don't agree that most contracts "actually stated exactly what the seller is saying. In many instances nothing is said about services, no bill of material included that lists all parts from bolts to toilet bowls
Well HHS if that is the case you should be questioning that before the contract is signed, not after.
Deserve all they get, Chelsea? Really now. spoken like an interested party. No sympathy for the punter, give the nod to the developer. So the game for the developer is write up weak, ambiguous contracts and put the onus on the punter or his lawyer to catch all the loop holes or they deserve all they get. or Where am I going wrong?
HHS, not a developer or interested party, but have worked in a sales position long enough to know that you can explain a contract to people for as long as you want, everything is agreed that the contract is ok and the end user signs on the line with both parties in agreement.
Then at the 1st instance of anything going wrong (normally with things clearly not included in the contract), it is suddenly the vendors fault. When clearly it had all been agreed upon with both parties signing the original contract.
Personally I have no time for people who sign a contract, know exactly what is in that contract and then when something is not going there way, suddenly cry foul on everyone in sight.
The USA has a lot to answer for in they way that they try and wriggle out of any legal arguement. People overthere try suing everyman and his dog to right a problem that was not in an original contract or the vendors fault, or whatever situation they are in that they think they can make some money out of.
Now unfortunatley the rest of the world is following suit, and the world is a lot worse off for them starting it.

Always Borrow Money from a Pesimist. "They Never Expect it Back"