Thailand set to oppose marine wildlife protection

Local Hua Hin and regional Thailand news articles and discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
buksida
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 24166
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 12:25 pm
Location: south of sanity

Thailand set to oppose marine wildlife protection

Post by buksida »

Thailand will be juggling several hot-potato wildlife issues as it hosts the 16th Conference of the Parties to CITES, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, which starts on Sunday and runs through March 14 in Bangkok.

While Thailand struggles to defend its trade in ivory and crocodile skin, the CITES meeting will bring proposals to protect seven species of sharks and manta rays.

"If the proposal is accepted, the breeding of some ornamental fishes will be affected," said Theerapat Prayurasiddhi, deputy chief of the National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department.

A farm-bred short-tail stingray can fetch up to Bt30,000.

Fisheries Department director-general Wimol Jantrarotai said Thailand would oppose the measure on manta rays. "The protection will hurt us. We have imported breeder fishes from Latin America and exported our bred fishes to the Middle East," he said.

Regarding sharks, Wimol expressed doubts about a report that Thailand was among the top shark-catching countries.

The Pew Environmental Group ranks Thailand in 12th place, based on reported shark catches between 2000 and 2009. Thailand reported catching 9,025 tonnes of sharks, rays and chimaeras to the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation in 2010. "I think there are some inaccuracies," Wimol said, explaining that the sharks might have been caught in fishing nets by accident.

Thai laws had already protect the great white and elephant sharks.

The shark trade is fuelled by demand for shark-fin soup, and while Hong Kong is the largest market, shark-fin soup is a delicacy found in many restaurants in Thailand.

Source: The Nation

Thought: Disgusting. Thaksin must have shares in a shark fin restaurant chain somewhere. :guns: :guns: :guns: :guns:
Who is the happier man, he who has braved the storm of life and lived or he who has stayed securely on shore and merely existed? - Hunter S Thompson
User avatar
STEVE G
Hero
Hero
Posts: 13612
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 3:50 am
Location: HUA HIN/EUROPE

Re: Thailand set to oppose marine wildlife protection

Post by STEVE G »

I've often taken a walk down the fishing pier in Hua Hin to watch fishing boats offload their catch and it's obvious that they just sell everything that comes out of the net, there are rays, small sharks and all sorts of other stuff along with the more common fish and it all disappears into the back of trucks or gets sold to locals.
User avatar
Big Boy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 49387
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 7:36 pm
Location: Bon Kai

Re: Thailand set to oppose marine wildlife protection

Post by Big Boy »

Isn't the problem that once netted, there would be very little chance of survival anyway? I'm sure I've seen documentaries where undersize fish are returned to the sea dead, rather than the trawler risk being caught with an undersized catch.
Championship Plymouth Argyle 1 - 2 Leeds Utd :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

Points 46; Position 23 RELEGATED :cry: :cry:
User avatar
STEVE G
Hero
Hero
Posts: 13612
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 3:50 am
Location: HUA HIN/EUROPE

Re: Thailand set to oppose marine wildlife protection

Post by STEVE G »

Yes, I'm sure that's the case, once it's netted and dead, it surely makes no sense to throw it back in the sea. Obviously this is a lot different to catching large sharks just for the fins.
User avatar
buksida
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 24166
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 12:25 pm
Location: south of sanity

Re: Thailand set to oppose marine wildlife protection

Post by buksida »

A bit of good news on this at last ...

Sharks, manta rays win protection
Several shark species and the manta ray won international trade protection Monday in a move hailed by conservationists as a breakthrough in efforts to save them from being wiped out by overfishing.

The deal at a major wildlife conference in Bangkok marked a rare victory in the fight by environmentalists to reverse a slump in populations of sharks - the world's oldest predator - due to rampant demand for its fins.

Rather than a complete ban, the 178-member Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (Cites) voted to restrict cross-border trade in the oceanic whitetip, the porbeagle, three types of hammerheads and the manta ray.

The agreement, which must still be formally approved by the Cites plenary session, delighted conservationists who warn that Asia's voracious appetite for shark fins is causing their population to plunge.

"The tide is now turning for shark conservation," said Elizabeth Wilson of Pew's Global Shark Conservation Campaign.

"With these new protections, oceanic whitetip, porbeagle and hammerhead sharks will have the chance to recover and once again fulfil their role as top predators in the marine ecosystem."

Full Story: Bangkok Post
Who is the happier man, he who has braved the storm of life and lived or he who has stayed securely on shore and merely existed? - Hunter S Thompson
User avatar
Nereus
Hero
Hero
Posts: 11046
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 3:01 pm
Location: Camped by a Billabong

Re: Thailand set to oppose marine wildlife protection

Post by Nereus »

I thought that there was a thread about the following, but I cannot find it
...........................................................................................................
Negligence is killing the Gulf

http://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opin ... g-the-gulf

Please credit and share this article with others using this link:http://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opin ... g-the-gulf. View our policies at http://goo.gl/9HgTd and http://goo.gl/ou6Ip. © Post Publishing PCL. All rights reserved.

For the past two weeks, the Esperanza _ a vessel operated by Greenpeace to collect information on the health of the oceans _ has been patrolling the Gulf of Thailand. And what it's seen is not pretty. The Greenpeace ship arrived in Thailand on June 15 to find out why the once-abundant sea has reached such a sorry state within such a short period of time. It did not take the Greenpeace team long to find... to find out who the culprits are.

After just a week in Thai waters, the ship has encountered nearly 100 commercial bottom-trawlers freely bulldozing the seabed and whole habitats of marine lives with impunity.
.............................................................................................
As mentioned previously by Pete, it is no longer possible to copy and paste articles from the Bangkok Post. It has to be asked if this is just Bangkok Posts policy, or is it another case of "it wasn`t me"? :?
May you be in heaven half an hour before the devil know`s you`re dead!
User avatar
AhFarangJa
Member
Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 9:51 am
Location: Saudi & Hua Hin

Re: Thailand set to oppose marine wildlife protection

Post by AhFarangJa »

Where are the bottom trawlers from? I hear a lot about trawlers from other countries as well as Thailand scraping the seabed with no thought for tomorrow, happens elsewhere too, money talks.... :(
User avatar
usual suspect
Ace
Ace
Posts: 1941
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:10 pm
Location: Huahin

Re: Thailand set to oppose marine wildlife protection

Post by usual suspect »

So much for the Premier's promises eh..? Nothing ever happens.
And she will be making the same futile statement just now over Thailand's on-going human-traffic issues to the U.S.A.
Just add it to the existing list eh..
Refugees, rice, fish, policing, tuk-tuks, airport security, park-rangers, conservation, protection of elephants, traffic laws, lawless Hi-So's, & imported sports cars...but to name a few.
Do Greenpeace publicise their findings worldwide..??
User avatar
buksida
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 24166
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 12:25 pm
Location: south of sanity

Re: Thailand set to oppose marine wildlife protection

Post by buksida »

The government attempted to set up a "no fishing in breeding season" policy which should protect future generations. There are more boats out there during breeding season because some corrupt 'official' has taken a bung and turns a blind eye. And so much for the protection of marine national parks - all you see on any dive in Thai waters is swathes of fishing nets suffocating the coral. Money is the only thing that matters to these people.

The problem, as mentioned in the report, is that the trawlers take absolutely everything, keep about a quarter of the catch, and kill the rest. Couple that with using the ocean as a refuse dumping ground and these fishing boats become the biggest threat to Thai waters and its marine ecosystem. By the time my kids are my age there will be no fish or coral left in the Gulf. :guns:
Who is the happier man, he who has braved the storm of life and lived or he who has stayed securely on shore and merely existed? - Hunter S Thompson
User avatar
usual suspect
Ace
Ace
Posts: 1941
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:10 pm
Location: Huahin

Re: Thailand set to oppose marine wildlife protection

Post by usual suspect »

Sad but true Buksi..& when your kids are older the trawlers will have by then decimated the Andaman waters also.. :banghead: :(
User avatar
margaretcarnes
Rock Star
Rock Star
Posts: 4172
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:28 am
Location: The Rhubarb Triangle

Re: Thailand set to oppose marine wildlife protection

Post by margaretcarnes »

In many places undersized or oversized fish caught in the nets are returned dead into the sea - and I think there can be valid arguments for that. Why should a small boat carry fish it can't sell, which takes up space needed for the catch it is fishing for?
OK if the 'wrong' sized fish can be used when landed fair enough, but often that isn't the case.
In Thailand I would think almost everything landed will be used. There is no incentive for them to fish sustainably, either financially or ethically. And as long as the Thai 'live for today' culture remains I'm afraid the necessary controls on net size, bottom fishing, inshore waters etc simply won't be enforced.
A sprout is for life - not just for Christmas.
Post Reply