Jockey wrote:
Huahinsimon - why should someone who has been shouted at and humiliated have a duty to go back to face the owner? I would say its the other way around - the manager has a duty to respect the customers and the owner has a duty to find a good manager.
Jockey, read my post below:
May I suggest you owe the readers of your thread and AIHH the
courtesy of closure on your post. A strongly worded complaint with no attempt at reconcillation is not "cricket" is it? or am I off base here?
No mention of DUTY, sir. mention of "courtesy" to readers and owner. In his following post Wanderlust picked up your erroneous use of the word "duty" and continued with it.
KK raked AIHH over the coals and most likely with cause. I agree that the order of action should be the owner contact KK, if he left his cell or the owner reads this forum it's possible , baring that the ball is in KK's court.
Come on man, its not such a difficult thing to go into a place and ask to speak to the owner and politely explain your experience.

Its not like being asked to give a public speech, which most people rate as a number one fear.
I went through a similar exp with YOBT. I had an issue with the fish and chips. Bill had published an offer to personally cook a meal if anyone was dissatisfied. I met Bill, he explained that when he's not there the staff are tempted to take short cuts. He cooked. I took pictures of the fish and chips he served and he uses them on his website now, instead of the stock picture of fish and chips his webmaster found, which look nothing like or as tasty as Bill's. So Bill got a big benefit out of my return visit, I got to experience his best effort and have returned again. It was a win/win situation for all, if I am not wrong, which I often am.
HHS
The devil made me do it the first time.
The second time I did it on my own.
When I finally got to the land of milk and honey, the milkman shot me
Happy wife, Happy life!